Rented normally, it costs you £160 a month. That is £1,914 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

You top up £160 a month — the mortgage takes 48p of every pound of rent

Borrowing £29,453 less would close that shortfall — which is £29,453 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

£313 mortgage

£469 running

£647 rent in£160 short

£175 of that is a guess — no service charge published.

□ service charge not published2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£27,255 + refurb costs

And about £9,572 more over five years, because it loses £160 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£27,255 to buy it

~£11,362

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · feeswe haven’t been inside

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The search

No offer makes this pay

Even at £46,200 — well below the £77,000 asked — the rent still does not cover the costs. The gap is the rent against the running costs, not the price, so negotiating does not close it.

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedtested down to £46,200

Is the price right?Comparables

We can't tell — nothing nearby is alike enough

The dearest sold for 3.5× the cheapest, so the rent has to justify this price on its own.

you'd pay £77,000

£45,000

£59,250

£67,000

£75,000

£84,000

£87,000

£92,000

£98,000

£107,000

£110,000

£135,500

£157,000

£45k£101k£157k

£45,000 cheapest£157,000 dearest

12 completed sales, same property type, last 3 years

□ 12 sold nearby, not matched on sizeHM Land Registry Price Paid Data

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries the whole loan — it could fall 16% and still cover it

Your deposit is what limits this one, not the rent. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£523 needed

of £622 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £622PRA-style test

Is it a good location?Open the map

No school rated Good or better in this postcode area

1 school in this postcode area, none rated Good or better and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Not assessed for this address

■ postcode area, not this address

What to know before you offerThe checks

Every tenancy here is periodic, with no Section 21 to end it

Tenancies are now periodic, with no Section 21 — budget a longer void.

1 problem found · 2 came back clear · 3 we could not check · 3 do not apply to this property

■ from the Renters’ Rights Act 2025listing last seen 12 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Every way loses money — Standard rental loses least, at £160 a month

Let it to the council: £72 a year less, but they keep paying when it is empty.

Standard rental−£160 · £38,617 in

Guaranteed council rent−£166 · £38,617 in

Housing-benefit rent−£277 · £38,617 in

Short-stay let−£308 · £38,617 in

20 nearby short-lets within 20 km · medium confidence

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Rent by the room (only 2 bedrooms) · Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 4 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with?The five-year sums

−£15,897 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 30% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £38,617 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed