Rented normally, it costs you £277 a month. That is £3,326 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

You top up £277 a month — the mortgage takes 67p of every pound of rent

Borrowing £51,167 less would close that shortfall — which is £51,167 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

£467 mortgage

£483 running

£700 rent in£277 short

£175 of that is a guess — no service charge published.

□ service charge not published2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£39,225 + refurb costs

And about £16,629 more over five years, because it loses £277 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£39,225 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£10,764, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The search

No offer makes this pay

Even at £69,000 — well below the £115,000 asked — the rent still does not cover the costs. The gap is the rent against the running costs, not the price, so negotiating does not close it.

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedtested down to £69,000

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £74,271 of the £86,250 loan

That £11,979 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £96. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£782 needed

more than the £673 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £673PRA-style test

How big is it, really?The plan

The rooms are on the plan; the total is not

The plan is on file; the floor area is not.

□ no floor area published

Is it a good location?Open the map

No school rated Good or better in this postcode area

4 schools in this postcode area, none rated Good or better and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Not assessed for this address

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

You would need a licence from the council first

Letting without the council’s licence is an offence, and the fee is in no figure here.

2 problems found · 3 came back clear · 2 we could not check · 2 do not apply to this property

■ from council licensing registerlisting last seen 13 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Short-stay let beats Standard rental by £306 a month

Short-stay let also ties up the least cash, £49,989.

Short-stay let+£29 · £49,989 in

7 nearby short-lets within 20 km · low confidence

Standard rental−£277 · £49,989 in

Housing-benefit rent−£509 · £49,989 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Rent by the room (only 2 bedrooms) · Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Guaranteed council rent (no scheme in this borough) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 3 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with?The five-year sums

−£22,926 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 27% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £49,989 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed