Rented normally, it costs you £651 a month. That is £7,806 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

The mortgage alone costs more than the whole rent — you top up £651 a month

It is £651 a month short. Borrowing £120,096 less would close that shortfall — which is £120,096 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

£1,259 mortgage

£1,184 rent in£651 short

£150 of that is a guess — no service charge published.

□ service charge not published2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£106,657 + refurb costs

And about £39,031 more over five years, because it loses £651 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£106,657 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£17,630, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The search

No offer makes this pay

Even at £185,970 — well below the £309,950 asked — the rent still does not cover the costs. The gap is the rent against the running costs, not the price, so negotiating does not close it.

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedtested down to £185,970

Is the price right?The deeds

Last sold for £188,000 in 2019

Nothing nearby is comparable, but asking is 65% more than the £188,000 paid for it in 2019.

□ this address’s own deeds, no comparable saleHM Land Registry Price Paid Data

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £125,623 of the £232,463 loan

That £106,839 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £86,739. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£2,107 needed

more than the £1,138 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £1,138PRA-style test

Who has to say yes?Council record

Oldham council decides

Named from the postcode, with no decision record under it. Check Oldham council's pre-application advice before you commit to a room-let plan.

■ Article 4 — planning permission required◧ authority from the postcode□ no decision recordfrom the Article 4 map we hold

Is it a good location?Open the map

Manchester, M35 9RG

4 of 5 schools in this postcode area rated Good or Outstanding and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Planning permission required to let by the room

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

The council here has taken away the automatic right to rent this out by the room

You would have to apply for permission first, and the council can say no.

2 problems found · 2 came back clear · 5 we could not check

■ from the Article 4 maplisting last seen 15 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Every way loses money — Guaranteed council rent loses least, at £614 a month

Let it to the council and you keep £37 a month more, and they keep paying when it is empty.

Guaranteed council rent−£614 · £124,287 in

Standard rental−£651 · £124,287 in

Rent by the room−£707 · £124,287 in

Housing-benefit rent−£905 · £124,287 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Short-stay let (no local short-let data) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 4 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with?The five-year sums

−£53,040 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 26% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £124,287 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed